<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Old School Blogging - Blogging in the old fashion way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldschoolblogging.com</link>
	<description>Blogging in the old fashion way</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Blogging mistakes you should avoid by Jim Spence</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/5-blogging-mistakes-you-should-avoid/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Spence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/?p=7#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I was searching for Blogs about quick money making and found this site.  I am interested in your content and appreciate sites like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was searching for Blogs about quick money making and found this site.  I am interested in your content and appreciate sites like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Commission Junction Settlement - Does CJ owe you money? by Shill Hater</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/commission-junction-settlement-does-cj-owe-you-money/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Shill Hater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/?p=27#comment-39</guid>
		<description>No the reason epople are suing them [CJ] is because they failed to uphold their fiduciary responsibility to you the affiliate and allowed scumware publishers to steal from regular affiliates.  You not knowing that is part of their cover up, if you do know then your complacency is pathetic ... bend over and take it from CJ?  

Why bother being an affiliate?  It's free branding for merchants, that's proven with the REAL lawsuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No the reason epople are suing them [CJ] is because they failed to uphold their fiduciary responsibility to you the affiliate and allowed scumware publishers to steal from regular affiliates.  You not knowing that is part of their cover up, if you do know then your complacency is pathetic &#8230; bend over and take it from CJ?  </p>
<p>Why bother being an affiliate?  It&#8217;s free branding for merchants, that&#8217;s proven with the REAL lawsuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday Quick Links by dumis</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/friday-quick-links/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>dumis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/?p=11#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ovidiu! I really apreciate it! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ovidiu! I really apreciate it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday Quick Links by Ovidiu - GuitarFlame.com</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/friday-quick-links/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Ovidiu - GuitarFlame.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/?p=11#comment-5</guid>
		<description>You have pretty good links here, I always enjoy reading Yaro Starak' blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have pretty good links here, I always enjoy reading Yaro Starak&#8217; blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Third-Party ads now available on the Google content network by gibsy</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/3rd-party-ads-now-available-on-the-google-content-network/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>gibsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 17:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/?p=5#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Posted this link in www.surfurls.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted this link in <a href="http://www.surfurls.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.surfurls.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Third-Party ads now available on the Google content network by Ovidiu - GuitarFlame.com</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/3rd-party-ads-now-available-on-the-google-content-network/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Ovidiu - GuitarFlame.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolblogging.com/?p=5#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, this is something that I have always asked myself why they don't support it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, this is something that I have always asked myself why they don&#8217;t support it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
